Peter L. Pete Kaufman
Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Plaintiffs
Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Plaintiffs
Create an account to contact this attorney
Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.
Peter L. Kaufman is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Plaintiffs, Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs and Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs.Peter L., who practices law in Los Angeles, California, has been recognized since 2018. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Peter L. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area. Peter L. Kaufman is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Plaintiffs, Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs and Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs.Peter L., who practices law in Los Angeles, California, has been recognized since 2018. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Peter L. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area. Peter L. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Jurisdiction
California
State Capital
Sacramento
Highest Court
California Supreme Court
Bar Association
State Bar of California
Typical Consultation
$150-$300
Typical Hourly Range
$250-$450/hr
Fee Model Notes
Hourly or flat-fee billing is common.
Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.
Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2018
Gary Edwards
I hired Peter Kaufman after being injured by a defective medical device, a case squarely in his recognized expertise in mass torts and product liability. His 24 years of experience and the firm's reputation were major factors in our decision. On the legal merits, Mr. Kaufman was undeniably knowledgeable. He understood the complexities of the litigation and his strategy seemed sound. However, the experience fell short in day-to-day execution. There were often significant delays in receiving responses to emails or calls, leaving us in the dark for weeks at a time. While his associate was more accessible, we had expected more direct communication from a lead attorney of his stature. The case was resolved adequately, but the process felt more impersonal than anticipated given his 'Lawyer of the Year' recognition. He is clearly a skilled litigator, but client management and setting clear expectations for communication could be improved.
Labor and Employment Law - Management Litigation - Labor and Employment