Strategic Market Intelligence Report: The Alaska Legal Sector ("907 Attorney")

1. Introduction: The "907" Identifier as a Jurisdictional Brand

The term "907 Attorney" operates as a potent signifier within the American legal landscape, extending far beyond its utilitarian function as a telephonic area code. As the sole area code for the entire state of Alaska, a landmass that constitutes approximately one-fifth of the United States' total size "907" encapsulates a legal market defined by extreme logistical challenges, a unique fusion of federal Indian law and corporate structure via the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), and a high-stakes maritime sector governed by distinct federal statutes.1 Understanding this market requires a granular, expert-level understanding of the socio-legal fabric that defines Alaska's practice.

Alaska’s legal environment is characterized by a "brain drain" and a reliance on imported legal talent, creating a supply-demand imbalance that drives specific practice areas.2 Unlike the "Lower 48," where county-based jurisdictions prevail, Alaska operates as a unified judicial district where state and federal interplay is constant, particularly regarding land rights, resource extraction, and subsistence living. The "907" legal practitioner must navigate a "bush justice" system where magistrates often non-lawyers adjudicate in remote villages, while simultaneously handling complex multi-million dollar maritime litigation in Anchorage or Juneau.4

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the Alaska legal market, segmented by high-demand practice areas, the unique infrastructure of rural justice, and the regulatory environment.

1.1 The Geopolitical Uniqueness of the Alaska Bar

The Alaska Bar Association regulates a legal community that is geographically concentrated yet operationally dispersed. The market is defined by a heavy reliance on a few urban hubs (Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau) to service a territory that spans the Arctic, the Aleutians, and the Southeast panhandle. This centralization creates a unique "fly-in" legal culture, where attorneys based in Anchorage frequently travel to remote hubs like Bethel, Nome, or Kotzebue to represent clients in courts that may lack a permanent judge.2

The sheer scale of the jurisdiction influences every aspect of legal practice. A criminal defense attorney in the "907" zone does not merely drive to the county courthouse; they must navigate weather delays, bush plane schedules, and the distinct cultural expectations of Alaska Native communities. This logistical reality filters the attorney population, favoring those with the resilience to operate in harsh conditions—a quality that becomes a key part of the "907 Attorney" brand identity.

1.2 The "Import" Model and Educational Void

A critical structural weakness and a defining characteristic of the Alaska legal market is the absence of a state law school. A 2004 report by the UAA Institute of Social and Economic Research questioned the feasibility of an Alaskan law school, and two decades later, the state still "imports all of its lawyers".2 This reliance on external education creates a barrier to entry and contributes to the high cost of legal services. Attorneys moving to Alaska often face a steep learning curve regarding local idiosyncrasies specifically the "Rule 81" admissions (pro hac vice) and the unique civil rules regarding attorney fees.7

The lack of a local law school means that the "907 Attorney" community is a melting pot of legal pedigrees from across the nation, yet it is tightly knit. The barrier to entry fosters a sense of exclusivity and high demand. Recruitment bulletins highlight a minimum of five years of large firm experience required for roles in Commercial Contracting, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Construction Law, indicating that the market values seasoned expertise over fresh graduates.8 This dynamic creates a bifurcated market: high-value corporate/government work in urban centers versus a struggle for basic representation in family and criminal law in the "bush," often filled by pro bono initiatives like Alaska Legal Services Corporation.9

2. Structural Analysis of the Alaska Legal Market

To understand the "907 Attorney" designation is to understand the demographics of the professionals behind it. The Alaska Bar Association statistics reveal a legal community that is aging, heavily reliant on out-of-state counsel, and struggling to meet the needs of its rural population.

2.1 Demographics and Attorney Distribution

Data from the Alaska Bar Association indicates a total membership of approximately 4,864. However, a deeper dive into these numbers reveals a critical distinction between "active" and "available" counsel. Only 2,307 members are active within the state.10 This discrepancy highlights a significant reliance on out-of-state counsel (967 active outside) and a large retired cohort (884), suggesting a potential crisis in succession planning for local firms.

This demographic reality informs the client intent behind seeking a "907 Attorney." Clients are often looking for local representation in a market flooded with out-of-state interests. The presence of nearly 1,000 active attorneys residing outside Alaska underscores the state's economic integration with the Pacific Northwest, particularly in maritime and natural resource law. However, for a DUI in Palmer or a divorce in Wasilla, a client needs one of the 2,307 in-state actives, making the "local" signal of the 907 area code crucial.

2.2 The Urban-Rural Divide and the "Justice Gap"

The concentration of attorneys in Anchorage creates a service vacuum in rural areas. While urban centers attract "well-connected, affluent kids" who return from law school, rural Alaska suffers from a chronic shortage of legal professionals.3 This shortage forces the state to rely on alternative admission strategies.

One such strategy is Alaska Bar Rule 43.6, which allows attorneys licensed in other states to practice pro bono in Alaska without undergoing the typical admission process or paying fees, provided they partner with a qualified legal service provider like Alaska Legal Services Corporation (ALSC).9 This rule explicitly targets "high-need areas" such as family law, landlord-tenant disputes, and bankruptcy. Highlighting attorneys who participate in these programs or firms that offer "unbundled" services to rural clients can be a significant value differentiator for legal service providers.

2.3 Economic Drivers: Resources and Government

The demand for legal services in Alaska is inextricably linked to its resource-based economy. The "907 Attorney" is frequently a specialist in industries that barely exist in other states. The dominance of Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) as major economic engines creates a specific demand for attorneys well-versed in government contracting, 8(a) certification, and employment law specific to these entities.8 These corporations are not merely businesses; they are quasi-governmental entities with specific mandates under ANCSA, requiring counsel that understands the intersection of corporate profit and indigenous social welfare.

Furthermore, the state sector remains a massive employer. The Department of Law actively recruits for sections including Labor & State Affairs, Public Corporations, and Torts & Workers' Compensation.12 The recruitment of "Agency Attorneys" and "General Government Services Attorneys" in locations like Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau highlights the centralized nature of the state's legal infrastructure. For private practice attorneys, this creates a steady stream of administrative law work and government contract litigation.

3. Maritime and Admiralty Law: The "907" Heavyweight Sector

For a "907 Attorney," maritime law is not a niche—it is a primary economic pillar. Alaska’s coastline exceeds that of the entire contiguous United States, and its waters are the workplace for thousands of commercial fishermen, longshoremen, and energy sector workers. The legal framework governing these waters is entirely distinct from terrestrial labor law, creating a high-value vertical for legal services.

3.1 Jurisdictional Dichotomy: Jones Act vs. Longshore Act

The distinction between a "seaman" and a "harbor worker" is the single most critical determination in Alaska injury litigation. This classification dictates whether an injured worker sues under the Jones Act (based on negligence) or claims benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) (a no-fault scheme).13

3.1.1 The Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 30104)

The Jones Act applies to "seamen"—defined as masters or members of a crew of a vessel. In Alaska, this covers the vast commercial fishing fleet, ferry workers (Alaska Marine Highway System), and tugboat crews.14

• Negligence Standard: Unlike workers' compensation, a Jones Act claim requires proving employer negligence. However, the burden of proof is "featherweight," meaning even slight negligence on the part of the employer that contributes to the injury can result in full liability.13 This lower evidentiary threshold makes Jones Act cases particularly viable for plaintiffs.

• Maintenance and Cure: Regardless of fault, injured seamen are entitled to daily living expenses ("maintenance") and medical costs ("cure") until they reach maximum medical improvement.13 A failure by an employer to provide these benefits can lead to punitive damages, a common leverage point for Alaska attorneys.

• Unseaworthiness: A separate cause of action under general maritime law, often pleaded alongside Jones Act negligence. It allows recovery if the vessel, its equipment, or its crew were not fit for their intended purpose. This is a strict liability standard—the owner is liable even if they did not know about the defect.15

3.1.2 The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA)

This federal statute covers workers engaged in maritime employment on navigable waters or adjoining areas (docks, terminals, piers).

• Coverage Scope: It explicitly includes shipbuilders, repairers, and workers loading/unloading cargo—a massive demographic in ports like Dutch Harbor, Kodiak, and Anchorage.16

• Mechanism: It functions as a federal workers' compensation program. The worker does not need to prove fault. It provides wage replacement and medical benefits.18

• Exclusions: It explicitly excludes masters and crew members, reinforcing the need for precise legal classification. If a "907 Attorney" misclassifies a client, they could be barred from the appropriate remedy.18

3.2 High-Stakes Litigation and Settlements

The financial stakes in Alaska maritime law are exceptionally high due to the dangerous nature of the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska fisheries. The "907 Attorney" in this sector is often litigating against major insurance conglomerates or the U.S. government. Recent verdicts and settlements documented in the research snippets underscore the value of specialized representation:

These figures demonstrate why the Alaska Maritime sector is a highly competitive practice area. The 2025 landscape continues to see litigation regarding the definition of vessels and the scope of "navigable waters," particularly in the context of oil and gas exploration on man-made islands in the Beaufort Sea.21 In Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries Service (2024), the federal court rejected challenges to the listing of the Arctic Ringed Seal, a decision with profound implications for maritime logistics and subsistence hunting rights.22 Furthermore, strictly enforced environmental regulations led to a $1.18 million penalty against Kodiak-based fishing companies in late 2024 for Clean Water Act violations involving oily bilge discharge.23

3.3 Environmental Compliance and Defense

The "907 Attorney" is not always on the plaintiff's side. A robust defense practice exists to protect fishing companies and vessel owners from the aggressive enforcement of environmental laws. The 2024 judgment against Kodiak companies for bilge discharge illustrates the severe financial penalties associated with the Clean Water Act.23 This creates a demand for attorneys who can navigate the intersection of criminal defense (environmental crimes) and civil regulatory compliance. The Oceana v. National Marine Fisheries Service litigation regarding bottom trawling habitats in the Gulf of Alaska further highlights the ongoing battle between conservation groups and the commercial fishing industry, a conflict that fuels a significant portion of Alaska's federal court docket.24

4. Alaska Native Law: Sovereignty, Corporations, and Land

A "907 Attorney" specializing in Native law must navigate the complex, often contradictory relationship between Tribal governments and Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs). This dual system, established by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) of 1971, makes Alaska unique in Federal Indian Law.

4.1 The ANCSA Framework: Corporations vs. Tribes

Unlike the "reservation" model common in the Lower 48, ANCSA extinguished aboriginal land titles in exchange for 44 million acres of land and nearly $1 billion. This land was transferred not to tribal governments, but to 12 Regional Corporations and over 200 Village Corporations.25

• Corporate Nature: These entities are profit-making corporations under state law, tasked with managing resources for shareholders (Alaska Native people). Attorneys here function as corporate counsel, dealing with board governance, dividend distribution, and resource development contracts.26

• Shareholder Issues: Original shares were inalienable, but amendments (specifically in 1991) allowed for the enrollment of "after-borns" (Natives born after 1971) and created new classes of stock. This has led to complex internal politics and litigation regarding the "dilution" of original shares versus the inclusion of younger generations.25

• Disenrollment Power: Courts have confirmed the Secretary of the Interior's power regarding enrollment eligibility, a frequent source of internal corporate litigation.26 The Sealaska litigation referenced in the snippets highlights the ongoing tension over who qualifies as a shareholder.26

4.2 The "Indian Country" Legal Battle

The status of "Indian Country" in Alaska remains the most litigated topic in the state. The legal definition of Indian Country dictates whether tribes have territorial jurisdiction over crimes and civil regulations.

• 2025 Policy Shifts: Recent executive actions in early 2025 have sought to "unleash Alaska's resource potential" by reviewing and potentially revoking Department of Interior guidance on taking lands into trust. This policy explicitly targets the balance between state sovereignty and tribal rights, aiming to ensure federal actions are consistent with the Alaska Statehood Act.28

• Gaming and Sovereignty: In late 2025, the Trump administration revoked a legal memo that supported the establishment of tribal casinos in Eklutna and Juneau. The revocation cited the ANCSA extinguishment of Indian Country, putting the future of tribal gaming in Alaska in jeopardy. This creates a volatile environment for attorneys advising on tribal economic development, as the regulatory ground is constantly shifting.29

• Tribal Jurisdiction: Despite the corporate land ownership, Alaska Tribes retain inherent sovereignty over domestic relations (ICWA cases) and, increasingly, public safety issues in villages. The Native Village of Saint Michael v. State (2025) decision regarding child removal underscores the continued high-stakes litigation over the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) in Alaska courts.30

4.3 Co-Stewardship: A New Administrative Frontier

A growing area of law involves "Co-Stewardship" agreements. In late 2024, the Department of Interior signed landmark agreements with Alaska Native Tribes and Corporations to co-manage public lands and waters, specifically regarding salmon stocks in the Yukon and Kuskokwim regions.31 These agreements create a new layer of administrative law, requiring attorneys to mediate between federal agencies, state regulators (who often oppose federal overreach), and tribal entities. For the "907 Attorney," this represents a new practice area: negotiating the specific terms of how tribes manage federal lands—a hybrid of environmental law, contract law, and sovereignty.

5. Criminal Law: The 2025 Landscape of DUI and Diversion

Criminal defense is a high-volume practice area for "907 Attorneys," dominated by alcohol-related offenses. Alaska’s DUI laws are among the strictest in the nation, and 2025 has introduced significant legislative changes that fundamentally alter defense strategies.

5.1 The 2025 DUI Diversion Program (HB 2)

A major development in 2025 is the introduction of House Bill 2 (HB 2), titled the "DUI Diversion Program." This bipartisan bill aims to shift the focus from incarceration to rehabilitation for eligible offenders.32

• Mechanism: It allows first-time offenders to enter a diversion agreement. Upon successful completion of a treatment program and adherence to conditions (e.g., sobriety, community service) for one year, the charges are dismissed with prejudice.34

• Eligibility: The program is generally available to those without prior DUI convictions. It requires a screening interview and potential treatment programs.

• Strategic Implication: For defense attorneys, securing entry into this program is now the primary objective for qualifying clients. It represents a fundamental shift in Alaska's prosecutorial approach. Practice focus for "907 Attorneys" in 2025 will likely pivot to expertise in securing HB 2 diversions for professionals who cannot afford a criminal record.

5.2 Statutory Penalties and the "Look-Back"

For those who do not qualify for diversion, Alaska Statute 28.35.030 imposes severe mandatory minimums. The severity of punishment escalates rapidly based on prior convictions within a 15-year "look-back" period.35

• Felony Threshold: A third offense becomes a Class C felony if the prior two occurred within the last 10 years (distinct from the 15-year general enhancement window for misdemeanors). This nuanced distinction—15 years for misdemeanor enhancement, 10 years for felony threshold—is a critical detail that experienced "907 Attorneys" leverage in plea negotiations.35

• Electronic Monitoring: House arrest is an option for second offenses, but adds complexity to sentencing negotiations.36

5.3 Administrative License Revocation (ALR)

Parallel to criminal proceedings is the DMV administrative track. A driver’s license is revoked immediately upon arrest if a breath test shows.08% BAC or for refusal to test.

• Refusal Penalties: "Refusal" to submit to a chemical test is a separate crime and carries the same penalties as a DUI. It can also be a felony if the driver has priors.37

• Revocation Periods: Administrative revocation periods mirror criminal ones (90 days for 1st offense, up to 5 years for 3+ priors).38 "907 Attorneys" must litigate both the DMV hearing and the criminal trial. The DMV hearing often serves as a valuable discovery tool for the criminal case, allowing the attorney to cross-examine the arresting officer before trial.

6. The "Bush Justice" System: Rural Practice Logistics

Perhaps the most distinguishing feature of the "907" legal landscape is the administration of justice in the "Bush"—the vast, roadless areas of the state.

6.1 The Magistrate System

Due to the lack of resident judges and lawyers in small communities, Alaska relies heavily on Magistrates.

• Non-Lawyer Judges: Under Alaska statutes, magistrates do not strictly need to be lawyers, although they receive training from presiding judges.5 This is a unique feature where a layperson may be adjudicating significant rights.

• Jurisdiction Tiers:

• Magistrate Judge 1: Part-time, rural locations, handles minor offenses, misdemeanors, and emergency hearings. They often perform clerical duties as well.39

• Magistrate Judge 2: Full-time, handles broader district court duties, often in hub communities. They handle arraignments, search warrants, and bail hearings.40

• Function: For a felony, they handle the preliminary stages before the case is transferred to a Superior Court Judge in a hub city (Bethel, Nome, Kotzebue).41 This creates a bifurcated defense strategy: winning the bail hearing in the village magistrate court, then preparing for trial in the regional hub.

6.2 Logistics: The "Flying" Lawyer and Remote Justice

Attorneys in rural practice must be logistics experts. "Flying to court" is literal. Weather delays can strand attorneys for days, impacting court calendars and client costs.6

• Telephonic & Video Justice: Long before the COVID-19 pandemic, Alaska was a pioneer in remote hearings. Supreme Court Order 1115 (1992) and subsequent rules authorized telephonic participation for bail and omnibus hearings.42

• Zoom Standardization: Post-2020, Zoom has become the standard for many non-trial proceedings. The court system has issued detailed "Zoom Guidelines" requiring witnesses to have exhibits beforehand and lawyers to manage "audio lag".43 For rural clients, this increases access to justice, allowing them to hire Anchorage-based "907 Attorneys" without paying for prohibitive travel costs. The snippets highlight specifically that attorneys should "pause before speaking" to handle lag and ensure witnesses have headsets to avoid paper-shuffling noise.44

6.3 Restorative Justice and Circle Sentencing

In response to the "cultural mismatch" of the adversarial western system, rural Alaska utilizes restorative justice models, such as Circle Sentencing.

• Mechanism: Involves the offender, victim, and community members discussing the harm and agreeing on a rehabilitation plan. This is often done in collaboration with the state court system.45

• Attorney Role: The attorney acts less as a fighter and more as a "support person" or facilitator. Understanding the nuance of when to request a Circle Sentencing (usually post-plea, pre-sentence) is a key skill for rural practitioners.45

• Tribal Courts: Federally recognized tribes operate courts that handle civil matters and, increasingly, diversions from state courts. Attorneys must be familiar with the specific codes and procedures of the local tribal entity, which differ vastly from state rules.46

7. Civil Practice & Procedure: The Economic Rules of Engagement

The civil litigation market in Alaska is driven by personal injury (auto, aviation, maritime), medical malpractice, and commercial disputes, all governed by a set of civil rules that are unique in the United States.

7.1 Rule 82: The "English Rule" of Fee Shifting

Alaska is unique among US states in its widespread adoption of a modified "English Rule" regarding attorney fees, codified in Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 82.

• Fee Shifting: The prevailing party in a civil lawsuit is typically entitled to partial reimbursement of attorney fees from the losing party. This is not full reimbursement but is calculated as a percentage of the judgment (roughly 10-20% for contested cases with trial).47

• Strategic Impact: This rule discourages frivolous lawsuits and encourages settlement. A plaintiff with a weak case risks not only losing but having to pay a portion of the defendant's legal bills. Conversely, it empowers plaintiffs with strong cases to demand higher settlements, as the defendant faces the risk of paying the judgment plus fees.

7.2 Contingency Fees and Hourly Rates

In personal injury cases, "907 Attorneys" typically operate on a contingency fee basis.

• Standard Rate: The market standard is 33.3% (one-third) of the recovery. This can rise to 40% if the case goes to trial or appeal.48 Firms like the Law Office of Jason Skala emphasize "no fee unless you win," aligning the lawyer's incentive with the client's outcome.50

• Hourly Rates: For non-contingency work (family law, criminal defense, corporate), hourly rates in Alaska are substantial due to the high cost of living and operations. The average hourly rate for an Alaska attorney is approximately $329, with a range generally between $210 and $443.51 This places Alaska above many southern states but below the major legal markets of New York and California.

• Flat Fees: To combat sticker shock, many firms are moving to flat-fee models for transactional work. For example, estate planning packages in Alaska are often transparently priced: ~$1,000 for a basic "Bronze" plan and up to $1,600+ for a "Gold" trust-based plan.52

7.3 Remote Hearings: The New Procedural Norm

Supreme Court Order 2018 established expectations for remote hearings, creating a permanent hybrid system.

• Etiquette: The snippets emphasize that "disruptive conduct" like background noise or driving while attending a hearing can result in rescheduling. Attorneys are expected to "dress for court" even on video.53

• Grand Jury via Video: The courts have even experimented with hybrid Grand Jury proceedings, allowing jurors to attend remotely from hub courts to ensure a diverse jury pool that represents the vast geography of the district.54

8. Consumer Protection: Hiring a "907 Attorney"

For prospective clients, understanding how to vet an Alaska attorney is crucial. The small size of the bar means reputation is everything, but objective metrics exist.

8.1 Disciplinary Transparency

The Alaska Bar Association maintains a searchable "Attorney Public Discipline History" database.

• Client Due Diligence: Potential clients are encouraged to check for suspensions or disbarments.56 Common violations include fee disputes, lack of communication, and failure to return unearned fees. Disbarment is reserved for severe ethical breaches, such as making material false statements.57

• Status Codes: Understanding the Bar's status codes is essential. "Active" means eligible to practice. "Inactive" or "Retired" members cannot provide legal advice, though "Emeritus" members can do pro bono work.58

8.2 Questions to Ask

Snippet 59 and 60 provide a checklist for hiring:

1. Experience: "Does the lawyer have experience with this kind of problem?" (Crucial for Maritime/Native law).

2. Fees: "Is there a standard fee?" (Flat fee for DUIs/Wills).

3. Malpractice Insurance: "Does the lawyer carry malpractice insurance?" (Not always mandatory in every jurisdiction, so a key question).

4. Bar Status: "Are they active and in good standing?"

9. Conclusion

The "907 Attorney" operates in one of the most demanding legal environments in the United States. It is a market defined by extremes: the immense wealth of maritime and resource extraction contrasted with the resource scarcity of rural justice; the rigidity of federal Indian law contrasted with the fluidity of state-tribal relations.

For observers of this market, the "907" designation implies more than a location; it implies logistical fortitude. Whether it is a maritime lawyer securing a $10 million judgment for a crushed limb in the Arctic 14 or a criminal defense attorney navigating the new 2025 diversion laws for a client in Palmer 32, the competent Alaska attorney is a specialist in overcoming geography, weather, and complex jurisdictional overlap. The data shows that while the bar is aging and relies on imported talent, the demand for specialized, high-stakes representation in maritime and Native law remains robust and lucrative. The introduction of the DUI Diversion Program in 2025 marks a modernizing shift in the state's criminal justice approach, creating new opportunities for defense counsel to advocate for rehabilitation over incarceration.

Works cited

1. Personal Injury Attorney | Car Accidents | Alaska - Anchorage, AK, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.907attorney.com/

2. The Alaska Legal Landscape - Alaska Business Magazine, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.akbizmag.com/industry/professional-services/the-alaska-legal-landscape/

3. Alaska Desperately Needs More Attorneys : r/LawSchool - Reddit, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LawSchool/comments/1g2z8jh/alaska_desperately_needs_more_attorneys/

4. Bush Justice and Development in Alaska: Why Legal Process in Village Alaska Has Not Kept up with Changing Social Needs [original paper] - ScholarWorks@UA, accessed December 24, 2025, https://scholarworks.alaska.edu/handle/11122/9770

5. Magistrates strive for justice in rural, urban Alaska courts, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskapublic.org/programs/2020-03-06/magistrates-strive-for-justice-in-rural-urban-alaska-courts

6. The Southeast Alaska Birding Trail: A Guide to the Southeast's Natural Wonders, accessed December 24, 2025, https://ak.audubon.org/sites/default/files/audak_2018_spring_newsletter_medres.pdf

7. Admissions & Licensing - Alaska Bar Association, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskabar.org/admissions-licensing/

8. Attorney Employment – Alaska Bar Association, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskabar.org/for-lawyers/employment-bulletin-board/attorney-employment-2/

9. Bring Your Legal Expertise to Alaska: Pro Bono Opportunities for Out-of-State Attorneys, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.alsc-law.org/2024/bar-rule-43-6/

10. Member Statistics – Alaska Bar Association, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskabar.org/for-lawyers/member-statistics/

11. Alaska Bar Association – Enhancing Our Justice System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskabar.org/

12. Careers - Civil Attorney Positions - Alaska Department of Law, accessed December 24, 2025, https://law.alaska.gov/department/jobs/jobs-CIV-attorney.html

13. The Major Difference between the Jones Act Law and the Longshore Act - The Young Firm, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.jonesactlaw.com/library/difference-jones-act-longshore-act/

14. Alaska Maritime Injury Attorney - BoatLaw, LLP, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.boatlaw.com/alaska/

15. Cole v. STATE OF ALASKA, DEPT. OF TRANSP., 621 F. Supp. 3 (D. Alaska 1984), accessed December 24, 2025, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/621/3/1368008/

16. The Basics Of Workers' Compensation On Alaska's Waters | Law Office of Justin S. Eppler, LLC, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.epplerlaw-ak.com/blog/the-basics-of-workers-compensation-on-alaskas-waters/

17. Jones Act and Longshore Claims in Alaska Maritime Accidents, accessed December 24, 2025, https://akpowerlaw.com/blog/2022/11/02/jones-act-and-longshore-claims-in-alaska-maritime-accidents/

18. Longshore Harbor Worker Claims | Alaska Admiralty Injury Lawyers, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.maritimelawyer.us/longshore-harbor-worker-claims.html

19. Maritime Primary Duty Doctrine Article | Alaska Admiralty Injury Lawyers, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.maritimelawyer.us/maritime-primary-duty-doctrine-article.html

20. Alaska Longshore Harbor Workers Claims - Washington Maritime Injury Lawyer, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.maritimelawyer.us/alaska-longshore-harbor-workers-claims.html

21. Beckwith v. ENI Petroleum US, LLC - Alaska Case Law, accessed December 24, 2025, https://law.justia.com/cases/alaska/supreme-court/2025/s-18591.html

22. Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries Service - The Climate Litigation Database, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.climatecasechart.com/collections/alaska-v-national-marine-fisheries-service_a0c9af

23. Court Imposes Over $1 Million in Civil Penalties on Fishing Companies and Manager for Oil Discharges into Coastal Alaskan Waters - United States Coast Guard News, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.news.uscg.mil/Press-Releases/Article/4262697/court-imposes-over-1-million-in-civil-penalties-on-fishing-companies-and-manage/

24. Oceana appeals court ruling over Gulf of Alaska environment - Saving Seafood, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.savingseafood.org/news/law/oceana-appeals-court-ruling-over-gulf-of-alaska-environment/

25. Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) 1971 | Tribal Governance, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.uaf.edu/tribal/academics/112/unit-3/alaskanativeclaimssettlementactancsa1971.php

26. Corporate | ANCSA Resource Center, accessed December 24, 2025, https://ancsa.lbblawyers.com/topic/corporate

27. Martha Hirschfield, Note, The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act: Tribal Sovereignty And The Corporate Form | ANCSA Resource Center, accessed December 24, 2025, https://ancsa.lbblawyers.com/hirshfield-note.htm

28. Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential - The White House, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/unleashing-alaskas-extraordinary-resource-potential/

29. Trump administration revokes legal memo behind Eklutna and Juneau tribal casinos, accessed December 24, 2025, https://nativenewsonline.net/sovereignty/trump-administration-revokes-legal-memo-behind-eklutna-and-juneau-tribal-casinos

30. Alaska Supreme Court Decisions 2025 - Justia Law, accessed December 24, 2025, https://law.justia.com/cases/alaska/supreme-court/2025/

31. Interior Department Signs Three Landmark Co-Stewardship Agreements with Alaska Native Tribes and Corporations - DOI Gov, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-signs-three-landmark-co-stewardship-agreements-alaska-native

32. HB2 | Alaska 2025-2026 | DUI DIVERSION PROGRAM - Legislative Tracking | PolicyEngage, accessed December 24, 2025, https://trackbill.com/bill/alaska-house-bill-2-dui-diversion-program/2595874/

33. AK HB2 | 2025-2026 | 34th Legislature - LegiScan, accessed December 24, 2025, https://legiscan.com/AK/bill/HB2/2025

34. AK HB2 - BillTrack50, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1775683

35. Alaska OUI Laws, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.ncdd.com/alaska-oui-laws

36. Misdemeanor vs Felony DUI Penalties in Alaska - Eric Derleth Trial Lawyer, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.trialguy.com/misdemeanor-vs-felony/

37. Alaska Statutes Title 28. Motor Vehicles § 28.35.030 - Codes - FindLaw, accessed December 24, 2025, https://codes.findlaw.com/ak/title-28-motor-vehicles/ak-st-sect-28-35-030/

38. dui (driving under the influence) administrative revocation - Alaska DMV, accessed December 24, 2025, https://dmv.alaska.gov/driver-services-adjudication/dui-driving-under-the-influence-administrative-revocation/

39. Magistrate Judge 1, C4103 - Alaska Court System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://courts.alaska.gov/hr/classspecs/4103.pdf

40. Magistrate Judge 2, C4104 - Alaska Court System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://courts.alaska.gov/hr/classspecs/4104.pdf

41. The Magistrate's Role in Alaska, Past and Present, accessed December 24, 2025, https://jukebox.uaf.edu/sites/default/files/documents/magistrates_connelly.pdf

42. SCO 1115 - Amending Criminal Rule 6 and Criminal Rule 38.1 concerning telephonic testimony in grand jury proceedings - Alaska Court System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://courts.alaska.gov/sco/docs/sco1115.pdf

43. Zoom Meetings - Alaska Court System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://courts.alaska.gov/trialcourts/zoom-faq.htm

44. Zoom Hearing Guidelines for Attorneys - Alaska Court System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://courts.alaska.gov/trialcourts/docs/zoom-guidelines-attorneys.pdf

45. Restorative Justice in Rural Alaska - Native American Rights Fund, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.narf.org/nill/documents/2012-ak_jrnl_dispute_resolution_pp17-26.pdf

46. Tribal Courts - Alaska Tribal Justice Resource Center, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.atjrc.org/tribal-courts/

47. Fee Arrangements | Anchorage, Alaska Injury Lawyers Atkinson Conway & Gagnon, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.alaskainjurylawgroup.com/frequently-asked-questions/fee-arrangements/

48. How Much Does it Cost to Hire an Alaska Personal Injury Attorney?, accessed December 24, 2025, https://akpowerlaw.com/blog/2025/03/24/how-much-does-it-cost-to-hire-an-alaska-personal-injury-attorney/

49. Altering Alaska's Rule 82 to Better Compensate Plaintiffs - Duke Law Scholarship Repository, accessed December 24, 2025, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1627&context=alr

50. Understanding Your Right to Compensation After an Injury in Alaska, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.907attorney.com/understanding-your-right-to-compensation-after-an-injury-in-alaska/

51. How much should I charge as a lawyer in Alaska | Clio, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.clio.com/resources/legal-trends/compare-lawyer-rates/ak/

52. Flat-Fee Packages - Alaska Estate Plans, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.alaskaestateplans.com/flatfee-packages

53. SCO 2018 - Expectations in Remote Proceedings LEG and TXT - Alaska Court System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://courts.alaska.gov/sco/docs/sco2018.pdf

54. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA In the matter of COURT OPERATIONS EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2021 MISCELL, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.akd.uscourts.gov/sites/akd/files/21-24_Court_Operations_Effective_11-1-21.pdf

55. HOW GRAND JURY ZOOMED INTO THE FUTURE Institute for Court Management Fellows Program 2019-2021 Court Project Phase November 2021 - National Center for State Courts, accessed December 24, 2025, https://cdm16501.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/tech/id/1137/download

56. Ethics & Discipline - Alaska Bar Association, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskabar.org/ethics-discipline/

57. KOUROUVACILIS v. AM. FED. OF STATE, CTY | 65 Mass. App. Ct. 521 - CaseMine, accessed December 24, 2025, https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b590add7b049347736a1

58. Status Information – Alaska Bar Association, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskabar.org/for-lawyers/status-information-dues/status-information/

59. How to Select a Lawyer - Alaska Bar Association, accessed December 24, 2025, https://alaskabar.org/for-our-community/how-to-select-a-lawyer/

60. Finding a Lawyer - Alaska Court System, accessed December 24, 2025, https://courts.alaska.gov/shc/shclawyer.htm