Nikki S. Khorram

Intellectual Property Law Litigation - Intellectual Property

3.0 (1 reviews)

San Diego, California

1+ years experience

Updated: Jan 04, 2026

Contact Information

312-558-5600

https://www.winston.com/en/professionals/khorram-nikki-s

333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor Los Angeles CA US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Nikki S. Khorram is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property Law and Litigation - Intellectual Property. Nikki S., who practices law in Los Angeles, California, has been recognized since 2024. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Nikki S. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property Law Litigation - Intellectual Property

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Commercial Litigation
Recognized: Intellectual Property Law
Recognized: Litigation - Intellectual Property

Recognized in Ones to Watch since 2024

Education

University of California Irvine, J.D., graduated 2014

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Samuel Anderson

2 weeks ago

Competent on IP litigation, but communication could improve

I engaged Nikki Khorram at Winston & Strawn to handle a trademark infringement dispute for my small tech company in San Diego. Her background in Intellectual Property Law and the recognition she's received in that field were the primary reasons for my choice. On the substantive legal work, she was thorough. Her analysis of the competing marks and the potential litigation risks was detailed and demonstrated a solid grasp of the issues, which you'd expect from an attorney recognized by Best Lawyers. However, the experience felt somewhat transactional. While she was always professional, I sometimes experienced longer-than-expected wait times for email responses, which added to my stress as a client needing timely updates. For straightforward matters, her competence is clear, but managing client expectations and maintaining consistent communication seemed to be areas still developing alongside her evident legal expertise. The outcome of our matter was acceptable, but the process felt more rigid than collaborative.