Damaris L. Medina

Health Care Law

3.0 (1 reviews)

Los Angeles, California

16+ years experience

Buchalter A Professional Corporation

Updated: Jan 02, 2026

Contact Information

213-891-0700

https://www.buchalter.com/attorneys/damaris-l-medina/

1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500, Los Angeles, CA 90017-1730

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Damaris Medina is a Shareholder in Buchalter’s Los Angeles & Orange County offices. She is Co-Chair of the Firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Practice, a member of the Board of Directors, the Firm’s Chief Diversity Officer and a member of the Firm’s Litigation and Health Care Practice Groups. Damaris Medina is a Shareholder in Buchalter’s Los Angeles & Orange County offices. She is Co-Chair of the Firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Practice, a member of the Board of Directors, the Firm’s Chief Diversity Officer and a member of the Firm’s Litigation and Health Care Practice Groups. Damaris Medina is a Shareholder in Buchalter’s Los Angeles & Orange County offices. She is Co-Chair of the Firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Practice, a member of the Board of Directors, the Firm’s Chief Diversity Officer and a member of the Firm’s Litigation and Health Care Practice Groups.

Practice Areas

Health Care Law

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Health Care Law
Practice Area: Criminal Defense: White-Collar

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2023

Education

Suffolk University, J.D., graduated 2009

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Scott Phillips

2 months ago

Competent in white-collar defense, but communication could improve

Damaris Medina capably handled a complex healthcare fraud investigation for my company. Her 16 years of experience and recognition in white-collar criminal defense were evident in her strategic approach. She is clearly knowledgeable, and her role as Co-Chair of the Health Care practice at Buchalter provided valuable insight. However, responsiveness was inconsistent at times, with significant delays in returning calls or emails during non-critical phases. While the legal outcome was satisfactory, the process felt more transactional than collaborative. For straightforward matters requiring her specific expertise, she is a solid choice, but set clear expectations for communication timelines from the start.