Wm. Howell Morrison

Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants

3.0 (1 reviews)

Milwaukee, South Carolina

10+ years experience

Updated: Jan 02, 2026

Contact Information

803-779-3080

https://www.hsblawfirm.com/attorneys/wm-howell-morrison

134 Meeting Street, Third Floor P.O. Box 340 Charleston SC US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Wm. Howell Morrison has built a successful Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants practice serving South Carolina. Howell Morrison's 10 years of legal practice demonstrates a commitment to Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants excellence. Howell Morrison provides compassionate yet aggressive representation when clients need it most. Wm. Howell Morrison takes a client-focused approach, ensuring individuals understand their legal options. Admitted in South Carolina, Howell Morrison remains committed to serving clients with distinction.

Practice Areas

Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants

Awards & Recognition

Lawyer of the Year: Bet-the-Company Litigation, Charleston, SC (2026)
Lawyer of the Year: Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants, Charleston, SC (2022)
Recognized: Bet-the-Company Litigation
Recognized: Commercial Litigation
Recognized: Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants
Practice Area: Legal Malpractice Law - Defendants
Practice Area: Litigation - Banking and Finance
Practice Area: Litigation - Environmental

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2015

Education

The University of South Carolina School of Law, J.D., graduated 1979

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Brandon Ward

2 weeks ago

Competent and experienced, but communication could improve

I engaged Mr. Morrison of Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd regarding a professional liability matter for my small engineering firm. His background in Professional Malpractice Law for defendants was a key factor in my selection, and his recognition in the field is well-earned. He demonstrated a solid grasp of the technical details and the relevant South Carolina law, drawing on his decade of experience effectively. The initial strategy he outlined was sound. However, the experience fell short in responsiveness. There were periods of several days where updates were not forthcoming, and at times, his communication felt more perfunctory than collaborative. While the legal work itself was competent and he ultimately helped us reach a reasonable settlement, managing client expectations and maintaining a consistent dialogue are areas for improvement. For straightforward defense work, he is capable, but be prepared to follow up proactively.