Thomas M. Mercure

Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs

3.0 (1 reviews)

New York, New York

15+ years experience

Updated: Jan 03, 2026

Contact Information

716-849-1333

https://www.lipsitzgreen.com/attorneys/mercure-thomas/

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 Buffalo NY US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Thomas M. Mercure is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs, Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs and Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs. Thomas M., who practices law in Buffalo, New York, has been recognized since 2010. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Thomas M. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.

Practice Areas

Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs

Awards & Recognition

Lawyer of the Year: Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs, Buffalo (2021)
Recognized: Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs
Recognized: Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs
Recognized: Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs
Practice Area: Personal Injury Litigation
Practice Area: Product Liability Litigation

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2010

Education

University of Buffalo Law School, J.D., graduated 1997

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

William Williams

2 months ago

Competent handling of a complex medical malpractice case

Attorney Thomas Mercure and his team at Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria capably managed my family's medical malpractice claim following a surgical error. His 15 years of experience and recognition in plaintiff-side litigation were evident in the strategic approach to our case. The legal work itself was thorough, and we achieved a settlement. However, communication was sometimes a challenge; responses to emails could take several days, and updates felt infrequent during slower periods. While his expertise from the University of Buffalo Law School and his noted accolades are not in question, managing client expectations on timelines and accessibility could be improved. For straightforward legal competence, he is solid, but the overall client experience felt merely adequate.