Scott Matasar

Litigation - Banking and Finance Litigation - Securities

3.0 (1 reviews)

Columbus, Ohio

-1+ years experience

Updated: Jan 04, 2026

Contact Information

216-453-8180

https://matasarjacobs.com/attorneys/scott-matasar/

1111 Superior Avenue, Suite 1355 Cleveland OH US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Claim this profile

Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.

Attorney Login Claim Profile

Bio

Scott Matasar is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Litigation - Banking and Finance and Litigation - Securities. Scott, who practices law in Cleveland, Ohio, has been recognized since 2026. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Scott is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.

Local Legal Snapshot

Jurisdiction

Ohio

State Capital

Columbus

Highest Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Bar Association

Ohio State Bar Association

Typical Consultation

$150-$300

Typical Hourly Range

$250-$450/hr

Fee Model Notes

Hourly or flat-fee billing is common.

Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.

Practice Areas

Litigation - Banking and Finance Litigation - Securities

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Litigation - Banking and Finance
Recognized: Litigation - Securities

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2026

Education

Boston University School of Law, J.D., graduated 1995

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Deborah Sanchez

3 months ago

Competent and recognized, but communication could improve

I hired Scott Matasar to handle a complex dispute involving a commercial loan agreement with a regional bank. His background in Litigation - Banking and Finance, and his recognition by Best Lawyers, were the primary reasons for my choice. Scott demonstrated clear expertise in the nuances of financial litigation during our strategy sessions. His analysis of the loan covenants and the lender's potential exposure was thorough. However, the experience was mixed. While the legal work itself was solid, there were often significant delays in receiving responses to emails, and updates on case developments were not as proactive as I would have preferred. For straightforward matters, his competence is evident, but for clients who prioritize frequent communication, expectations should be managed from the outset. The outcome of my case was satisfactory, aligning with his professional assessment.