Scott M. Perry
Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs
Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs
Create an account to contact this attorney
Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.
Scott M. Perry is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants, Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs and Professional Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs.Scott M., who practices law in Chicago, Illinois, has been recognized since 2011. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Scott M. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area. Scott M. Perry is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants, Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs and Professional Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs.Scott M., who practices law in Chicago, Illinois, has been recognized since 2011. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Scott M. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area. Scott M. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Jurisdiction
Illinois
State Capital
Springfield
Highest Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Bar Association
Illinois State Bar Association
Typical Consultation
Free-$150
Typical Hourly Range
Often contingency-based
Fee Model Notes
Many personal injury matters are handled on contingency, often around 25%-40% of recovery.
Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.
Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2011
Brian Howard
Scott Perry handled my medical malpractice case with remarkable expertise, drawing on his extensive 28 years of experience and strong recognition as a Best Lawyer in the field. His in-depth knowledge of professional malpractice law was evident throughout the process, and his strategic approach led to a favorable outcome. While his communication was top-notch, I wished he had been more proactive in updating me on minor case developments. The cost was reasonable, though slightly higher than expected, but the results justified it. His reputation as a Lawyer of the Year speaks for itself—I’d certainly recommend him for complex litigation.