Richard W. Westling

Criminal Defense: White-Collar

3.0 (1 reviews)

San Jose, Washington DC

6+ years experience

Updated: Jan 04, 2026

Contact Information

212-969-3000

https://www.proskauer.com/professionals/richard-westling

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 600 South Washington DC US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Claim this profile

Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.

Attorney Login Claim Profile

Bio

Richard W. Westling is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Criminal Defense: White-Collar. Richard W., who practices law in Washington, District of Columbia, has been recognized since 2019. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Richard W. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.

Local Legal Snapshot

Typical Consultation

$150-$350

Typical Hourly Range

$250-$600/hr

Fee Model Notes

Criminal defense matters are commonly billed flat-fee for defined phases or hourly for complex litigation.

Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense: White-Collar

Awards & Recognition

Lawyer of the Year: Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Nashville (2026)
Lawyer of the Year: Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Nashville (2022)
Recognized: Criminal Defense: White-Collar
Special Focus: Governmental Investigations

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2019

Education

Tulane University, J.D., graduated 2011

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

James Stewart

3 months ago

Competent on the case, but communication was inconsistent

Richard Westling handled my complex financial regulatory inquiry with clear expertise. His background in white-collar defense from Proskauer Rose was evident, and his recognition by Best Lawyers gave me confidence. He was thorough in his analysis of the SEC documents and provided a solid strategic outline. However, the experience was mixed. There were periods where I waited several days for responses to time-sensitive emails, which added to my stress. While his legal advice was sound, I sometimes felt I had to prompt for updates on case developments. For straightforward legal matters, his competence is undeniable, but for clients who prioritize consistent, proactive communication, there may be better fits. He resolved the inquiry successfully, but the process felt more reactive than I had hoped.