Peter A. Cal
Litigation - Bankruptcy
Litigation - Bankruptcy
Create an account to contact this attorney
Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.
Peter Cal is a Member in Sherman & Howard’s Trial and Litigation Group. He has represented clients in complex commercial disputes for more than 25 years. Peter focuses on all aspects of bankruptcy and insolvency matters including workouts, restructurings, bankruptcy court litigation, as well as financial and real estate litigation in state and federal courts. Peter regularly represents secured and unsecured creditors and chapter 7 trustees. Peter Cal is a Member in Sherman & Howard’s Trial and Litigation Group. He has represented clients in complex commercial disputes for more than 25 years. Peter focuses on all aspects of bankruptcy and insolvency matters including workouts, restructurings, bankruptcy court litigation, as well as financial and real estate litigation in state and federal courts. Peter regularly represents secured and unsecured creditors and chapter 7 trustees.
Jurisdiction
Colorado
State Capital
Denver
Highest Court
Colorado Supreme Court
Bar Association
Colorado Bar Association
Typical Consultation
$150-$300
Typical Hourly Range
$250-$450/hr
Fee Model Notes
Hourly or flat-fee billing is common.
Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.
Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2012
Betty Torres
I engaged Peter Cal of Taft in Denver to handle a complex commercial dispute for my small manufacturing company, which was entangled with a key supplier's Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. With his 38 years of experience and recognition in litigation and bankruptcy, I was confident in his deep technical knowledge of the area. His analysis of the creditor committee dynamics and our reclamation claim was thorough and demonstrated the expertise you'd expect from a veteran of Fordham Law. Ultimately, the outcome for our claim was satisfactory and aligned with his strategic assessment. However, the experience was marked by inconsistent communication. There were periods where responses to emails took several days, and updates often felt reactive rather than proactive, requiring me to follow up. While I never doubted his command of the law or his dedication to the case file, managing client expectations around timelines and process was an area that felt just adequate. For highly complex matters where sheer legal horsepower is the priority, Peter is a solid choice, but be prepared to manage the client-attorney communication flow actively.