Mehmet Munur

Information Technology Law

3.0 (1 reviews)

Columbus, Ohio

17+ years experience

Taft

Updated: Jan 02, 2026

Contact Information

614-220-0253

https://www.taftlaw.com/people/mehmet-munur/

41 South High Street, Suite 1800, Columbus, OH 43215-6106

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Mehmet Munur is a Partner at Taft. He concentrates his practice in the areas of technology, information privacy and security, and financial services regulation. Mehmet works on contracts for internet-based services, including drafting and negotiating software licenses or Software-as-a-Service ("SaaS") agreements, terms of use, privacy policies and other technology agreements. Mehmet regularly advises clients on technology outsourcing agreements, servicing, financing, and payments.He advises clients on privacy issues, laws, and regulation at the state, federal, and international level. More specifically, he advises clients on issues relating to the FTC Act, GLBA, CAN-SPAM, FCRA, FACTA, HIPAA and HITECH, CCPA, GDPR, and EU-U.S. Privacy Shield certification and compliance. Privacy Shield certification and compliance.

Practice Areas

Information Technology Law

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Information Technology Law
Recognized: IT Outsourcing Law
Recognized: Privacy and Data Security Law
Practice Area: Corporate Law

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2020

Education

Capital University, JD, magna cum laude, graduated 2008
Ohio Wesleyan University, BA, magna cum laude, graduated 2003

Connect

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Jessica Sanchez

2 weeks ago

Competent on the legal work, but communication could improve

I engaged Mehmet Munur at Taft to assist with drafting and negotiating a complex SaaS agreement for my Columbus-based software company. His deep knowledge in technology law was evident; he had a firm grasp of the data security clauses and liability limitations that were critical for our business. His background in IT outsourcing and privacy law, which his profile highlights, was clearly an asset during these discussions. The final contract was thorough and professionally crafted, providing solid legal protection. However, my experience was a mixed bag. While the substantive work was good, there were noticeable delays in receiving drafts and responses to my follow-up emails. At times, I felt I had to chase for updates, which added stress to an already tense negotiation process. His explanations of certain legal nuances, while accurate, were occasionally delivered in a way that assumed a higher level of baseline knowledge than I possessed. For straightforward matters within his recognized expertise, he is certainly capable. Yet, for a client who values consistent, proactive communication and clear, accessible guidance throughout the process, the service felt merely adequate. The legal product met expectations, but the client experience did not fully match the caliber of his technical reputation.