Keri L. Schaubert Ph.D.

Intellectual Property Law Litigation - Intellectual Property

3.0 (1 reviews)

New York, New York

-1+ years experience

Updated: Jan 03, 2026

Contact Information

215-665-2000

https://www.cozen.com/people/bios/schaubert-keri

3WTC 175 Greenwich Street, 55th Floor New York NY US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Claim this profile

Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.

Attorney Login Claim Profile

Bio

Keri L. Schaubert Ph.D. is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law and Litigation - Intellectual Property. Keri L., who practices law in New York, New York, has been recognized since 2026. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Keri L. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.

Local Legal Snapshot

Jurisdiction

New York

State Capital

Albany

Highest Court

New York Court of Appeals

Bar Association

New York State Bar Association

Typical Consultation

$150-$300

Typical Hourly Range

$250-$450/hr

Fee Model Notes

Hourly or flat-fee billing is common.

Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property Law Litigation - Intellectual Property

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Intellectual Property Law
Recognized: Litigation - Intellectual Property

Recognized in Ones to Watch since 2026

Education

Loyola University Chicago, J.D., graduated 2013

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Angela Torres

3 months ago

Competent on IP matters, but communication could improve

I engaged Keri Schaubert at Cozen O'Connor for guidance on a trademark dispute involving a former business partner. Her background in intellectual property law, including her recognition by Best Lawyers in that field, was evident in her thorough analysis of the case. She provided a solid legal strategy that addressed the core issues. However, the experience felt somewhat transactional. There were occasional delays in email responses, and at times, I felt I had to follow up to get updates on procedural steps. While her legal competence in IP litigation is not in question, and her Ph.D. brings a unique analytical depth, the client service aspect felt just adequate. For straightforward IP matters, she is capable, but set clear expectations on communication timelines.