Highly Skilled and Effective
Kari L. Sutherland of Butler Snow LLP is an outstanding attorney who handled my complex product liability case with remarkable expertise. With 29 years of experience, including defending major corporations like Monsanto, she brought a level of knowledge and strategy to the table that was truly impressive. Her trial experience was evident from the start, as she methodically prepared our case and anticipated every counterargument. Kari’s ability to simplify intricate legal concepts and keep me informed throughout the process was invaluable. She is not only highly recognized in product liability litigation but also a compassionate advocate for her clients. Thanks to her dedication and skill, we achieved a favorable outcome that exceeded my expectations. I would confidently recommend Kari to anyone in need of a top-tier attorney in general practice or litigation.
Incredibly Skilled and Professional
I had the pleasure of working with Kari L. Sutherland during a complex product liability case involving a major agricultural company. From the start, her deep expertise in defending manufacturers was evident. She not only had an impressive background in product litigation but also demonstrated a level of professionalism and dedication that set her apart. Kari's ability to navigate the intricacies of the case was remarkable, leveraging her 29 years of experience to craft a strong defense. Her recognition in product liability litigation was well-earned, as she handled every aspect of the case with precision and confidence. What truly impressed me was her commitment to achieving the best possible outcome while maintaining open and clear communication throughout. She made a challenging situation feel manageable, and her strategic approach ultimately led to a favorable resolution. I would highly recommend Kari to anyone in need of a top-tier trial attorney.
Invested Litigator with Winning Results
Working with Kari Sutherland on product liability litigation was a game-changer for our defense strategy. Her 29 years of experience, particularly in defending major manufacturers, brought an unmatched level of expertise to our case. From her leadership in high-profile trials like Monsanto’s Roundup litigation to her meticulous case preparation, Kari’s insights were invaluable. Her professionalism, deep trial experience, and recognized skill in product liability litigation gave us confidence throughout the process. The outcome was exactly what we needed, and we couldn’t have asked for a more dedicated advocate. Highly recommend her.
Skilled Defense Attorney with Depth of Knowledge
Working with Kari Sutherland on a complex product liability case was a game-changer. Her 29 years of experience defending manufacturers—including her work with high-profile clients like Monsanto—was immediately evident in her strategic approach. She handled our case with precision, leveraging her deep understanding of product litigation to anticipate opposing arguments. While her courtroom presence and legal acumen were outstanding, response times could occasionally lag, particularly during busy trial periods. The billing was transparent, though some fees leaned higher than expected for routine filings. Despite these minor drawbacks, I wholeheartedly recommend Kari for any defense litigation, especially in product liability matters. Her recognition in this field speaks volumes about her expertise.
Skilled Defense for Complex Litigation
Kari Sutherland is an exceptional attorney with a proven track record in product liability defense. When our company faced a high-stakes lawsuit involving a complex product, we knew we needed top-tier representation. Kari's 29 years of experience and her role as lead counsel in major cases, including her work with Monsanto, gave us confidence that she could handle the most challenging legal battles. Her deep understanding of product litigation and her strategic approach made all the difference in our case. From the initial consultation to the courtroom, Kari demonstrated unwavering professionalism, clarity, and an unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible outcome. Her recognition in product liability litigation only affirms what we already knew—she is one of the best in the field. We wouldn’t hesitate to recommend her to any business or individual facing similar legal challenges.
Adequate Defense in Complex Cases
I worked with Ms. Sutherland on a product liability case involving a major manufacturer. She brought strong expertise, particularly in defending large corporations—a key area where she's recognized. Her trial experience was evident, and she handled the procedural aspects well. However, communication could have been more consistent. While she was responsive overall, delays between updates left me uncertain at times. Costs were explained upfront, but the billing process felt less transparent than expected. Her legal strategy was sound, but I wouldn’t call it exceptional for the fees involved. For straightforward cases, she delivers, but if you need a highly personalized or proactive approach, you may want to explore other options.
Knowledgeable and Thorough Defense Attorney
Working with Kari L. Sutherland was a game-changer for my case. As a lead trial attorney for major manufacturers, her experience defending complex product liability cases was exactly what I needed. She handled a Monsanto-related litigation for us with precision, leveraging her extensive trial experience to secure a favorable outcome. While her legal expertise is undeniable—earning recognition in product liability defense—there were occasional delays in her responses due to her demanding caseload. That said, her strategic approach and deep understanding of regulatory compliance made the difference. The cost was higher than expected, but the results spoke for themselves. Highly recommend for high-stakes litigation.
Skilled but Inconsistent Communication
I hired Kari L. Sutherland to defend my company in a product liability case involving manufacturing negligence. Her experience in defending large manufacturers—especially her work with Monsanto—gave me confidence that she was well-equipped to handle the case. She clearly understands the complexities of product litigation, and her trial experience was evident in how she prepared our defense. However, I found her communication style inconsistent. While she was thorough in court and during strategy sessions, follow-ups and updates were often delayed, which made it difficult to stay aligned. The case resolution was fair, but the process could have been smoother with better responsiveness. Overall, she’s a capable attorney with a strong track record, but clients should be prepared for some gaps in communication.
Exceptional Trial Attorney with Roundup Expertise
Kari Sutherland is an outstanding trial attorney who handled my complex product liability case with precision and confidence. As lead counsel in Monsanto's Roundup litigation, her experience and strategic approach gave me a clear advantage. She explained every step of the process thoroughly, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved. Kari's recognition in product liability defense speaks volumes about her expertise, and it showed in court. The only minor downside was occasional delays in response times, but this was outweighed by her exceptional courtroom performance. Her deep knowledge of general practice law and 29 years of experience provided invaluable guidance. I highly recommend Kari for anyone facing product liability or general litigation challenges. Her dedication and professionalism are unmatched.
Capable but Communication Could Improve
Attorney Sutherland handled my case with a solid grasp of product liability litigation, which was crucial given the complexity of the claims against a major manufacturer. She demonstrated deep expertise, particularly in defending large corporations—a skill set that clearly aligns with her recognized reputation in this area. However, while her trial experience was evident, I found communication to be somewhat inconsistent. Wait times for responses were often longer than expected, and follow-ups required multiple attempts. While the outcome was favorable, the process felt less transparent than anticipated. For someone with her background, I expected more proactive engagement. That said, her legal strategy was sound, and her courtroom experience was undeniably valuable. If communication improvements were made, the experience would have been stronger.
