Intellectual Property Law
Justin Watts is a distinguished attorney practicing at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, serving clients in Los Angeles and beyond. With over 16 years of experience in the legal field, Justin has established a reputation for excellence, particularly in the area of Intellectual Property Law. Throughout a career defined by dedication and strategic advocacy, Justin has advised a diverse clientele, ranging from individuals to large corporations, helping them navigate complex legal landscapes. At Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, the focus is always on achieving the best possible outcomes through rigorous preparation and a deep understanding of the law. Justin Watts's commitment to high ethical standards and professional ability has been recognized by peers and the legal community. Notable accolades include: These distinctions highlight Justin's standing as a leading figure in Intellectual Property Law. Justin Watts specializes in Intellectual Property Law, bringing a wealth of knowledge to every case. Whether in the courtroom or at the negotiating table, clients benefit from a practical, results-oriented approach. Key competencies include strategic counseling, risk assessment, and comprehensive litigation support tailored to the unique needs of each client. In an increasingly complex world, having a trusted legal advisor is essential. Justin Watts at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP offers the experience, integrity, and skill required to handle the most challenging legal matters. Clients can proceed with confidence, knowing they are represented by one of Los Angeles's most capable attorneys.Overview
Recognition and Achievements
Areas of Expertise
Conclusion
Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2009
Kenneth Ortiz
I retained Justin Watts for a complex patent infringement matter, drawn to his firm's reputation and his specific recognition in Intellectual Property law. His 16 years of experience were evident in his strategic approach to the litigation; he clearly understood the technical nuances of our software patent. The initial work was thorough. However, as the case progressed, communication became a challenge. Responses to emails were sometimes delayed by several days, and it was difficult to get clear updates on procedural timelines without persistent follow-up on my end. While the legal outcome was ultimately satisfactory, the process felt more reactive than collaborative. For straightforward, high-stakes IP litigation, his expertise is solid, but managing client expectations could be improved.
Corporate and Commercial Litigation Defamation and Media Law Professional Malpractice Law