Jennifer C. Adair

Litigation - Insurance

3.0 (1 reviews)

Atlanta, Georgia

26+ years experience

Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Contact Information

770-818-0000

https://www.fmglaw.com/lawyers/jennifer-c-adair/

100 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1600, Atlanta, GA 30339-5948

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Jennifer Adair is a Partner in Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP Atlanta office, Vice-Chair of the firm's Tort and Catastrophic Loss national practice section, and Chair of the firm's Southeast Tort practice team. Jennifer has extensive experience representing commercial motor carrier, their drivers, and their insurers in trucking lawsuits throughout Georgia. As a member of FMG’s construction section, Jennifer defends design professionals, owners and contractors in design and construction defect claims, as well as injury claims arising from construction site accidents. She also defends the owners and operators of commercial and residential properties in premises liability claims ranging from accidents to third party criminal activity, including claims of prostitution and human / sex trafficking brought against members of the hospitality industry. Jennifer has experience in product liability, wrongful eviction and foreclosure, property loss, and intentional torts. She is well-versed in alternative dispute resolution and has tried numerous cases to verdict in both jury trials and bench trials.

Practice Areas

Litigation - Insurance

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Litigation - Insurance
Recognized: Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Practice Area: Construction Law
Practice Area: Education Law
Practice Area: Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2022

Education

The University of Alabama, J.D., graduated 1999

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

John Evans

3 weeks ago

Competent but room to improve

Ms. Adair handled my construction litigation case with professionalism and a deep understanding of insurance and personal injury law. Her 26 years of experience was evident in her strategy, though I occasionally found communication delays frustrating. While she met expectations regarding case outcomes, I felt some delays in responses could have been managed better. Her recognition in construction law was reassuring, but I’d have preferred more frequent updates on developments. Overall, competent representation, but with room for improvement in client communication.