Christopher E. Rogers

Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs

3.0 (1 reviews)

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

7+ years experience

Updated: Jan 04, 2026

Contact Information

414-271-0900

https://www.habush.com/attorneys/christopher-e-rogers

150 East Gilman Street, Suite 2000 Madison WI US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Representing clients in Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs cases, Christopher E. Rogers practices in Wisconsin. E. Rogers has dedicated nearly a decade to mastering the nuances of Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs law. Known for accessibility and thorough case preparation, Christopher E. Rogers prioritizes client needs. E. Rogers works tirelessly to achieve the best possible outcomes for those represented. E. Rogers is proud to serve the Wisconsin community through quality legal representation.

Practice Areas

Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs

Awards & Recognition

Lawyer of the Year: Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs, Madison (2026)
Lawyer of the Year: Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs, Madison (2024)
Lawyer of the Year: Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs, Madison (2021)
Recognized: Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs
Recognized: Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2018

Education

University of Wisconsin–Madison, J.D., graduated 1995

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Anna Wilson

2 weeks ago

Competent and knowledgeable, but communication could improve

I hired Christopher Rogers at Habush Habush & Rottier to handle a personal injury case after a multi-vehicle collision on I-94. His firm's reputation in Milwaukee is well-known, and his specific recognition in personal injury litigation was a primary factor in my decision. Mr. Rogers’s knowledge of Wisconsin personal injury law is evident, and he was thorough in explaining the legal process and the nuances of my case. His nearly ten years of experience showed in his strategic approach. However, my experience was a mixed bag. While the legal outcome was ultimately satisfactory, there were significant lags in communication. Responses to emails or calls often took several days, which added unnecessary stress during an already difficult time. At times, I felt like I had to follow up repeatedly to get updates on basic procedural steps. His expertise is not in question—he clearly knows his field, as his 'Lawyer of the Year' accolades suggest. But the client service aspect felt just adequate. For someone who values consistent, proactive updates, this could be a drawback. He is a capable attorney who achieved the result, but the journey there required more patience on my part than I anticipated.