Chloé Salome Margulis

Intellectual Property Law Patent Law

3.0 (1 reviews)

New York, New York

-1+ years experience

Updated: Jan 03, 2026

Contact Information

646-746-2000

https://btlaw.com/en/people/chloe-margulis

390 Madison Ave 12th Floor New York NY US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Claim this profile

Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.

Attorney Login Claim Profile

Bio

Chloé Salome Margulis is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law and Patent Law. Chloé Salome, who practices law in New York, New York, has been recognized since 2026. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Chloé Salome is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.

Local Legal Snapshot

Jurisdiction

New York

State Capital

Albany

Highest Court

New York Court of Appeals

Bar Association

New York State Bar Association

Typical Consultation

$150-$300

Typical Hourly Range

$250-$450/hr

Fee Model Notes

Hourly or flat-fee billing is common.

Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property Law Patent Law

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Intellectual Property Law
Recognized: Patent Law

Recognized in Ones to Watch since 2026

Education

University of Minnesota, J.D., graduated 2020

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Christopher Bailey

3 months ago

Competent on IP matters, but communication could improve

I engaged Chloé Margulis at Barnes & Thornburg for guidance on a software patent application. Her background in Intellectual Property and Patent Law, including her recognition by Best Lawyers, was evident in her thorough analysis of the prior art. The legal strategy she drafted was solid. However, the experience was mixed. Responses to emails were sometimes delayed by several business days, which created anxiety during tight filing deadlines. While the final work product was technically proficient, I occasionally felt I had to follow up to stay in the loop on progress. For straightforward IP matters where timing is less critical, she is a capable attorney, but the client communication aspect fell short of expectations for the firm's reputation.