Chaunceton B. Bird

Commercial Litigation Product Liability Litigation - Defendants

3.0 (1 reviews)

Fort Worth, Utah

1+ years experience

Updated: Jan 03, 2026

Contact Information

801-532-7840

https://parrbrown.com/attorney/chaunceton-b-bird/

101 South 200 East, Suite 700 Salt Lake City UT US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Claim this profile

Are you this attorney? Claim or manage this listing by signing in or creating an attorney account.

Attorney Login Claim Profile

Bio

Chaunceton B. Bird is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation and Product Liability Litigation - Defendants. Chaunceton B., who practices law in Salt Lake City, Utah, has been recognized since 2024. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Chaunceton B. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.

Local Legal Snapshot

Jurisdiction

Utah

State Capital

Salt Lake City

Highest Court

Utah Supreme Court

Bar Association

Utah State Bar

Typical Consultation

$150-$300

Typical Hourly Range

$250-$450/hr

Fee Model Notes

Hourly or flat-fee billing is common.

Estimates vary by market, complexity, urgency, and attorney experience.

Practice Areas

Commercial Litigation Product Liability Litigation - Defendants

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Appellate Practice
Recognized: Commercial Litigation
Recognized: Product Liability Litigation - Defendants

Recognized in Ones to Watch since 2024

Education

University of Utah, J.D., graduated 2017

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Katherine Thompson

3 months ago

Competent and recognized, but communication could improve

I hired Chaunceton Bird from Parr Brown Gee & Loveless to handle a commercial dispute involving a breach of contract with a former business partner. Given his recognition in Commercial Litigation by Best Lawyers, I had high expectations for his legal acumen. On that front, he delivered; his analysis of the case was sharp, and he drafted a very strong motion for summary judgment that demonstrated his clear understanding of the law, which I attribute to his solid foundation from the University of Utah. However, the experience was a mixed bag. While the legal work was technically sound, I often found communication to be less than ideal. Responses to emails could take several days, and there were times I felt out of the loop on minor procedural developments. For a straightforward matter, his one year of post-graduation experience was sufficient, but I sensed a lack of proactive client management that more seasoned attorneys might offer. He is undoubtedly intelligent and recognized in his fields, including Appellate Practice, but the overall client service felt merely adequate, not exceptional.