Bradish J. "Brad" Waring

Bet-the-Company Litigation

3.0 (1 reviews)

Tucson, South Carolina

20+ years experience

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Contact Information

601-948-5711

https://www.butlersnow.com/professionals/brad-waring

25 Calhoun Street, Suite 250 Charleston SC US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

As a Bet-the-Company Litigation attorney, Bradish J. "Brad" Waring has been serving South Carolina for over two decades. Over over two decades, J. "Brad" Waring has built a strong track record in Bet-the-Company Litigation representation. Clients benefit from J. "Brad" Waring's dedication to clear communication and responsive service. J. "Brad" Waring understands the stress legal issues create and works to ease client concerns. Bradish J. "Brad" Waring is admitted to practice law in South Carolina and remains dedicated to professional excellence.

Practice Areas

Bet-the-Company Litigation

Awards & Recognition

Lawyer of the Year: Bet-the-Company Litigation, Charleston, SC (2024)
Recognized: Bet-the-Company Litigation
Recognized: Commercial Litigation
Special Focus: Civil Litigation
Special Focus: Complex Litigation
Special Focus: Insurance
Special Focus: Product Liability
South Carolina Super Lawyer - Business Litigation since 2008
University of South Carolina School of Law - Compleat Lawyer Award, Gold Category, 2005
South Carolina Lawyers Weekly - Leadership in Law Award, 2010
Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated, AV Preeminent

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2005

Education

The University of South Carolina School of Law, J.D., graduated 1978

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Christine Collins

2 weeks ago

Competent representation in commercial dispute

I hired Mr. Waring for a commercial litigation matter involving breach of contract. His extensive experience in business disputes and impressive recognition in Bet-the-Company litigation were evident during our case. Mr. Waring demonstrated solid knowledge of contract law and provided adequate representation that achieved our primary objectives. However, communication between meetings was sometimes delayed, and the overall process took longer than initially anticipated. While I would have preferred more proactive updates, his legal expertise was clear. The outcome was satisfactory, though not exceptional.