Arthur E. "Ted" Phelps, Jr.

Litigation - Insurance Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants

3.0 (1 reviews)

Columbus, Ohio

19+ years experience

Updated: Jan 02, 2026

Contact Information

513-381-9200

https://www.rendigs.com/arthur-e-phelps-jr/

600 Vine Street, Suite 2650 Cincinnati OH US

Create an account to contact this attorney

Bio

Arthur E. "Ted" Phelps, Jr. has established a strong reputation as a Litigation - Insurance Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants lawyer in Ohio. Over the course of over 15 years, E. "Ted" Phelps, Jr. has handled diverse Litigation - Insurance Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants matters. Clients value Arthur E. "Ted" Phelps, Jr.'s honest assessments and practical legal solutions. E. "Ted" Phelps, Jr. understands the stress legal issues create and works to ease client concerns. Arthur E. "Ted" Phelps, Jr. practices in Ohio with a reputation for thorough and effective advocacy.

Practice Areas

Litigation - Insurance Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants

Awards & Recognition

Recognized: Insurance Law
Recognized: Litigation - Insurance
Recognized: Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants
Recognized: Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants

Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2006

Education

Case Western Reserve University, J.D., graduated 1985

Get Directions on Google Maps

Reviews

Donald Ward

2 weeks ago

A competent and experienced defense attorney

I retained Mr. Phelps and his firm to defend my small medical practice in a malpractice suit. His 19 years of experience and recognition in medical malpractice defense for defendants were immediately apparent. He was thorough in his analysis of the case files and his strategy during depositions was sharp, clearly drawing on his deep background in both insurance and personal injury litigation. Ultimately, the case was resolved favorably, which is the primary goal. However, the experience felt somewhat transactional. Communication was functional but not proactive; I often had to follow up for updates, and responses could take several days. While his legal acumen is undeniable, the client service aspect felt just adequate. For a straightforward defense matter where expertise is paramount, he is a solid choice, but be prepared to manage your own expectations regarding accessibility and regular dialogue.