Adam B. Pignatelli
Litigation - Health Care
Litigation - Health Care
Create an account to contact this attorney
Adam focuses on business litigation and medical-legal matters in State and Federal courts and before State Professional boards, including Boards of Medicine, Nursing, Psychologists, Mental Health, Chiropractic, and Dentistry. Adam has litigated a diverse range of cases and appeals involving professional negligence, business torts, contractual and employment matters, as well as partnership and limited liability company disputes. Adam focuses on business litigation and medical-legal matters in State and Federal courts and before State Professional boards, including Boards of Medicine, Nursing, Psychologists, Mental Health, Chiropractic, and Dentistry. Adam has litigated a diverse range of cases and appeals involving professional negligence, business torts, contractual and employment matters, as well as partnership and limited liability company disputes. Adam focuses on business litigation and medical-legal matters in State and Federal courts and before State Professional boards, including Boards of Medicine, Nursing, Psychologists, Mental Health, Chiropractic, and Dentistry. Adam has litigated a diverse range of cases and appeals involving professional negligence, business torts, contractual and employment matters, as well as partnership and limited liability company disputes.
Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2021
Emily Wilson
I engaged Adam Pignatelli and his firm for a complex business dispute that involved potential professional board complaints, which aligned well with his stated focus on business litigation and medical-legal matters. His knowledge of the New Hampshire court system and his recognition in litigation fields was evident; he clearly understood the legal intricacies. The work product on our motions was solid. However, the experience was a mixed bag. While Adam was sharp in meetings, there were often significant delays in receiving email responses or updates, which created anxiety during a stressful time. For a straightforward matter, he would be a good choice, but for cases requiring frequent client touchpoints, the communication rhythm felt lacking. His expertise is not in question—he secured a reasonable settlement—but managing client expectations and proactive updates are areas where the service felt merely adequate, not exceptional.